Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 425
Filter
1.
Arch Virol ; 168(6): 166, 2023 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238472

ABSTRACT

Clostridium perfringens is a constituent of the normal gut microbiome in pigs; however, it can potentially cause pre- and post-weaning diarrhea. Nevertheless, the importance of this bacterium as a primary pathogen of diarrhea in piglets needs to be better understood, and the epidemiology of C. perfringens in Korean pig populations is unknown. To study the prevalence and typing of C. perfringens, 203 fecal samples were collected from diarrheal piglets on 61 swine farms during 2021-2022 and examined for the presence of C. perfringens and enteric viruses, including porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV). We determined that the most frequently identified type of C. perfringens was C. perfringens type A (CPA; 64/203, 31.5%). Among the CPA infections, single infections with CPA (30/64, 46.9%) and coinfections with CPA and PEDV (29/64, 45.3%) were the most common in diarrheal samples. Furthermore, we conducted animal experiments to investigate the clinical outcome of single infections and coinfections with highly pathogenic (HP)-PEDV and CPA in weaned piglets. The pigs infected with HP-PEDV or CPA alone showed mild or no diarrhea, and none of them died. However, animals that were co-inoculated with HP-PEDV and CPA showed more-severe diarrheal signs than those of the singly infected pigs. Additionally, CPA promoted PEDV replication in coinfected piglets, with high viral titers in the feces. A histopathological examination revealed more-severe villous atrophy in the small intestine of coinfected pigs than in singly infected pigs. This indicates a synergistic effect of PEDV and CPA coinfection on clinical disease in weaned piglets.


Subject(s)
Coinfection , Coronavirus Infections , Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus , Swine Diseases , Swine , Animals , Clostridium perfringens , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/veterinary , Weaning , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/veterinary , Diarrhea/pathology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Patient Acuity
2.
Yonsei Med J ; 64(6): 351-358, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20237931

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, has been spreading since 2019, causing a worldwide pandemic. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, tuberculosis, AIDS, and malaria have adversely affected the quality of life of patients and killed millions of people. In addition, COVID-19 continues to impede the delivery of health services, including those for the control of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Furthermore, NTDs have been reported as possible co-pathogens among patients infected with COVID-19. However, studies regarding parasitic co-infection among these patients have been limited. This review aimed to explore and describe the cases and reports of parasitic infections in the backdrop of COVID-19 to provide comprehensive knowledge regarding this aspect. We reviewed seven cases of patients who had parasitic co-infection and tested positive for COVID-19, and summarized the literature on the importance of controlling parasitic diseases. In addition, we identified recommendations for the control of parasitic diseases under possible difficulties, such as declining funding for parasitic diseases in 2020. This review highlights the growing burden of NTDs under COVID-19 that may be caused by the deficiency of healthcare infrastructure and human resources as the main reasons. Clinicians should remain vigilant for possible co-infections with parasites in COVID-19 patients, while policymakers are urged to reinforce a balanced and long-term health strategy that addresses both NTDs and COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Humans , Coinfection/epidemiology , Pandemics , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Attention
3.
Curr Microbiol ; 80(7): 223, 2023 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20231023

ABSTRACT

The novel human coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which results in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has caused a serious threat to global public health. Therefore, many studies are performed on the causes and prevalence of this disease and the possible co-occurrence of the infection with other viral and bacterial pathogens is investigated. Respiratory infections predispose patients to co-infections and these lead to increased disease severity and mortality. Numerous types of antibiotics have been employed for the prevention and treatment of bacterial co-infection and secondary bacterial infections in patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although antibiotics do not directly affect SARS-CoV-2, viral respiratory infections often result in bacterial pneumonia. It is possible that some patients die from bacterial co-infection rather than virus itself. Therefore, bacterial co-infection and secondary bacterial infection are considered critical risk factors for the severity and mortality rates of COVID-19. In this review, we will summarize the bacterial co-infection and secondary bacterial infection in some featured respiratory viral infections, especially COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Coinfection/epidemiology , Bacteria/genetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
4.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 85(1): 1-5, 2020 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323677

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the magnitude of the global COVID-19 pandemic, persons living with HIV (PLWH) may become coinfected with SARS-CoV-2. SETTING: We conducted a survey in Wuhan, China, to characterize the status of coinfected PLWH, their time to clinical improvement, and clinical prognoses. METHODS: Using a Wuhan shipping service for antiretroviral medications, the Wuhan LGBT Center screened 2900 PLWH shipping addresses and cross-referenced 36 of them to quarantine sites or hospitals, suggesting possible COVID-19 cases. Through telephone calls and WeChat (social media) messaging, we conducted a survey after obtaining online informed consent. RESULTS: We had 12 HIV-infected respondents (10 men and 2 women) who also reported COVID-19. The median age was 36 years (interquartile range: 33.0-56.3), mean age 42.4 years, and range 25-66 years of age. Nine of 10 persons on antiretroviral therapy (ART) presented with only mild COVID-19 symptoms. The 10th person on ART was a 56-year-old man who died at home early in the outbreak when health care services were overwhelmed. Two additional cases who had been in intensive care with acute COVID-19 were both men, aged 25 and 37 years; both were ART-naive until this hospitalization. Excluding the deceased man, 6 of 11 coinfected persons reported feeling depressed even after clinical improvements. CONCLUSION: Twelve coinfected persons were identified in Wuhan; 9 of 10 were on long-term ART and had favorable outcomes. Two men identified as having started ART only recently were found to have severe symptoms. Our case series suggests the value of ART for potential mitigation of COVID-19 coinfection.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Nature ; 617(7961): 555-563, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323608

ABSTRACT

An outbreak of acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children was reported in Scotland1 in April 2022 and has now been identified in 35 countries2. Several recent studies have suggested an association with human adenovirus with this outbreak, a virus not commonly associated with hepatitis. Here we report a detailed case-control investigation and find an association between adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV2) infection and host genetics in disease susceptibility. Using next-generation sequencing, PCR with reverse transcription, serology and in situ hybridization, we detected recent infection with AAV2 in plasma and liver samples in 26 out of 32 (81%) cases of hepatitis compared with 5 out of 74 (7%) of samples from unaffected individuals. Furthermore, AAV2 was detected within ballooned hepatocytes alongside a prominent T cell infiltrate in liver biopsy samples. In keeping with a CD4+ T-cell-mediated immune pathology, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II HLA-DRB1*04:01 allele was identified in 25 out of 27 cases (93%) compared with a background frequency of 10 out of 64 (16%; P = 5.49 × 10-12). In summary, we report an outbreak of acute paediatric hepatitis associated with AAV2 infection (most likely acquired as a co-infection with human adenovirus that is usually required as a 'helper virus' to support AAV2 replication) and disease susceptibility related to HLA class II status.


Subject(s)
Adenovirus Infections, Human , Dependovirus , Hepatitis , Child , Humans , Acute Disease/epidemiology , Adenovirus Infections, Human/epidemiology , Adenovirus Infections, Human/genetics , Adenovirus Infections, Human/virology , Alleles , Case-Control Studies , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/virology , Dependovirus/isolation & purification , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Helper Viruses/isolation & purification , Hepatitis/epidemiology , Hepatitis/genetics , Hepatitis/virology , Hepatocytes/virology , HLA-DRB1 Chains/genetics , HLA-DRB1 Chains/immunology , Liver/virology
6.
Nature ; 617(7961): 574-580, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2326179

ABSTRACT

As of August 2022, clusters of acute severe hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children have been reported from 35 countries, including the USA1,2. Previous studies have found human adenoviruses (HAdVs) in the blood from patients in Europe and the USA3-7, although it is unclear whether this virus is causative. Here we used PCR testing, viral enrichment-based sequencing and agnostic metagenomic sequencing to analyse samples from 16 HAdV-positive cases from 1 October 2021 to 22 May 2022, in parallel with 113 controls. In blood from 14 cases, adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) sequences were detected in 93% (13 of 14), compared to 4 (3.5%) of 113 controls (P < 0.001) and to 0 of 30 patients with hepatitis of defined aetiology (P < 0.001). In controls, HAdV type 41 was detected in blood from 9 (39.1%) of the 23 patients with acute gastroenteritis (without hepatitis), including 8 of 9 patients with positive stool HAdV testing, but co-infection with AAV2 was observed in only 3 (13.0%) of these 23 patients versus 93% of cases (P < 0.001). Co-infections by Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus 6 and/or enterovirus A71 were also detected in 12 (85.7%) of 14 cases, with higher herpesvirus detection in cases versus controls (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that the severity of the disease is related to co-infections involving AAV2 and one or more helper viruses.


Subject(s)
Adenovirus Infections, Human , Coinfection , Dependovirus , Hepatitis , Child , Humans , Acute Disease , Adenovirus Infections, Human/epidemiology , Adenovirus Infections, Human/virology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/virology , Dependovirus/genetics , Dependovirus/isolation & purification , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/epidemiology , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/virology , Hepatitis/epidemiology , Hepatitis/virology , Herpesvirus 4, Human/isolation & purification , Herpesvirus 6, Human/isolation & purification , Enterovirus A, Human/isolation & purification , Helper Viruses/isolation & purification
7.
Mycopathologia ; 188(1-2): 9-20, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2320653

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Fungal co-infections are considered an important complication in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 that can be attributed to disease aggravation, increased mortality, and poor outcomes. This study was conducted to determine the species distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida isolates from hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Shiraz, Iran, in addition to associated risk factors and outcomes of co-infections with Candida species. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center study, a total of 106 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were evaluated for clinical characteristics and outcomes. Species identification was performed by ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 gene sequencing. Antifungal susceptibility testing to fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, amphotericin B, and nystatin was determined according to the M27-A3/S4 CLSI protocol. RESULTS: Candida species were recovered from 48% (51/106) of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Statistical analysis showed that patients who had heart failure, bacterial co-infection, and were receiving empirical antifungal therapy had a higher risk of developing Candida co-infection. In total, 71 Candida isolates were recovered, of which C. albicans (69%) was the most prevalent isolate. The majority of the Candida isolates were susceptible to all classes of tested antifungal drugs. DISCUSSION: Our results elucidate a high rate of Candida co-infections among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Comorbidities such as heart failure, HTN, COPD, bacterial infections as well as therapeutic interventions including catheterization, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission increased the risk of Candida spp. isolation from the bloodstream, respiratory tract and urine samples, which led to a higher in-hospital mortality rate. Additionally, obtained data clarified that empirical antifungal therapy was not as successful as anticipated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Candidiasis , Coinfection , Heart Failure , Humans , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Candidiasis/microbiology , Candida albicans , Risk Factors , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Drug Resistance, Fungal
8.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0284759, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2316215

ABSTRACT

HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 co-infection is a common global health and socio-economic problem. In this paper, a mathematical model for the transmission dynamics of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 co-infection that incorporates protection and treatment for the infected (and infectious) groups is formulated and analyzed. Firstly, we proved the non-negativity and boundedness of the co-infection model solutions, analyzed the single infection models steady states, calculated the basic reproduction numbers using next generation matrix approach and then investigated the existence and local stabilities of equilibriums using Routh-Hurwiz stability criteria. Then using the Center Manifold criteria to investigate the proposed model exhibited the phenomenon of backward bifurcation whenever its effective reproduction number is less than unity. Secondly, we incorporate time dependent optimal control strategies, using Pontryagin's Maximum Principle to derive necessary conditions for the optimal control of the disease. Finally, we carried out numerical simulations for both the deterministic model and the model incorporating optimal controls and we found the results that the model solutions are converging to the model endemic equilibrium point whenever the model effective reproduction number is greater than unity, and also from numerical simulations of the optimal control problem applying the combinations of all the possible protection and treatment strategies together is the most effective strategy to drastically minimizing the transmission of the HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 co-infection in the community under consideration of the study.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Humans , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Computer Simulation , Models, Theoretical , Basic Reproduction Number
9.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 44: 100371, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314779

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Infection due to SARS-CoV-2 shows wide spectrum of disease from asymptomatic to severe disease and death. Coinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with other respiratory pathogens may affect the severity of disease and its outcome. Identification of other respiratory pathogens may help to initiate proper management and avoid unnecessary complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 250 SARS-COV-2 positive patients admitted in S.M.S hospitalwere included in study. Throat and nasopharyngeal swabs samples were collected in Viral Transport Medium (VTM) and nucleic acid extraction was done by automated EasyMag extractor and tested for 20 respiratory viruses and two bacteria by real time PCR. RESULTS: Out of 250 SARS CoV2 positive samples, 176 (70%) were positive for other respiratory pathogens also. The highest co-infection was due to HCoVOC43 (32.8%) virus followed by bacterial co-infection with S. pneumoniae (14.8%). Six (2.4%) patients with co-infection were on ventilator with age >65yr and three (1.2%) died during treatment. All three cases were found to have other co-morbid diseases like; asthma, Parkinson's and hypertension. CONCLUSION: High number of patients were found to have coinfection with other viruses and bacteria, timely identification and providing specific treatment to these patients can help improve outcome.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Viruses , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , India/epidemiology , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Bacteria
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 246, 2023 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Critically ill COVID-19 patients are highly susceptible to opportunistic fungal infection due to many factors, including virus-induced immune dysregulation, host-related comorbidities, overuse and misuse of antibiotics or corticosteroids, immune modulator drugs, and the emergencies caused by the pandemic. This study aimed to assess the incidence, identify the potential risk factors, and examine the impact of fungal coinfection on the outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A prospective cohort study including 253 critically ill COVID-19 patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the isolation ICU of Zagazig University Hospitals over a 4-month period from May 2021 to August 2021 was conducted. The detection of a fungal infection was carried out. RESULTS: Eighty-three (83) patients (32.8%) were diagnosed with a fungal coinfection. Candida was the most frequently isolated fungus in 61 (24.1%) of 253 critically ill COVID-19 patients, followed by molds, which included Aspergillus 11 (4.3%) and mucormycosis in five patients (1.97%), and six patients (2.4%) diagnosed with other rare fungi. Poor diabetic control, prolonged or high-dose steroids, and multiple comorbidities were all possible risk factors for fungal coinfection [OR (95% CI) = 10.21 (3.43-30.39), 14.1 (5.67-35.10), 14.57 (5.83-33.78), and 4.57 (1.83-14.88), respectively]. CONCLUSION: Fungal coinfection is a common complication of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Candidiasis, aspergillosis, and mucormycosis are the most common COVID-19-associated fungal infections and have a great impact on mortality rates.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Mucormycosis , Mycoses , Humans , Prospective Studies , Critical Illness , Coinfection/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Mycoses/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Hospitals, University
11.
BMC Pulm Med ; 23(1): 146, 2023 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although cases of respiratory bacterial infections associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have often been reported, their impact on the clinical course remains unclear. Herein, we evaluated and analyzed the complication rates of bacterial infections, causative organisms, patient backgrounds, and clinical outcome in Japanese patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included inpatients with COVID-19 from multiple centers participating in the Japan COVID-19 Taskforce (April 2020 to May 2021) and obtained demographic, epidemiological, and microbiological results and the clinical course and analyzed the cases of COVID-19 complicated by respiratory bacterial infections. RESULTS: Of the 1,863 patients with COVID-19 included in the analysis, 140 (7.5%) had respiratory bacterial infections. Community-acquired co-infection at COVID-19 diagnosis was uncommon (55/1,863, 3.0%) and was mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Hospital-acquired bacterial secondary infections, mostly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, were diagnosed in 86 patients (4.6%). Severity-associated comorbidities were frequently observed in hospital-acquired secondary infection cases, including hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. The study results suggest that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (> 5.28) may be useful in diagnosing complications of respiratory bacterial infections. COVID-19 patients with community-acquired or hospital-acquired secondary infections had significantly increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory bacterial co-infections and secondary infections are uncommon in patients with COVID-19 but may worsen outcomes. Assessment of bacterial complications is important in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and the study findings are meaningful for the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents and management strategies.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Community-Acquired Infections , Cross Infection , Respiratory Tract Infections , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Coinfection/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , East Asian People , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Disease Progression
12.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 22(4): 303-311, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300564

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In a historical era dominated by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a fact of growing interest emerges regarding co-infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis). This represents today an important clinical and diagnostic challenge, as the two pathogens are capable, through specific immunopathological mechanisms, of interacting with each other, determining a severe respiratory condition with a severe prognosis. AREAS COVERED: With this review, we wanted to collect and analyze the latest scientific evidence concerning the main immunopathogenetic mechanisms shared by these two respiratory pathogens, with particular interest in the possible iatrogenic factors favoring coinfection and the need to define multidisciplinary and standardized screening tools aimed to identify coinfection early, ensuring the best clinical and therapeutic management. EXPERT OPINION: The existence of a direct immunopathogenetic link between COVID-19 and TB indirectly contributes to mutual morbidity and mortality. The identification and application of early and standardized screening tools aimed at the identification of this condition is essential, in addition to vaccine prevention.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Coinfection/diagnosis , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/microbiology , Pandemics
13.
Math Biosci Eng ; 20(6): 9861-9875, 2023 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300253

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a mathematical model for COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA) co-infection, that enables the study of relationship between prevention and treatment. The next generation matrix is employed to find the reproduction number. We enhanced the co-infection model by incorporating time-dependent controls as interventions based on Pontryagin's maximum principle in obtaining the necessary conditions for optimal control. Finally, we perform numerical experiments with different control groups to assess the elimination of infection. In numerical results, transmission prevention control, treatment controls, and environmental disinfection control provide the best chance of preventing the spread of diseases more rapidly than any other combination of controls.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Pulmonary Aspergillosis , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Models, Theoretical , Pulmonary Aspergillosis/complications , Intensive Care Units
14.
Viruses ; 15(4)2023 03 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2299468

ABSTRACT

Τhe COVID-19 pandemic highly impacted the circulation, seasonality, and morbidity burden of several respiratory viruses. We reviewed published cases of SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory virus co-infections as of 12 April 2022. SARS-CoV-2 and influenza co-infections were reported almost exclusively during the first pandemic wave. It is possible that the overall incidence of SARS-CoV-2 co-infections is higher because of the paucity of co-testing for respiratory viruses during the first pandemic waves when mild cases might have been missed. Animal models indicate severe lung pathology and high fatality; nevertheless, the available literature is largely inconclusive regarding the clinical course and prognosis of co-infected patients. Animal models also indicate the importance of considering the sequence timing of each respiratory virus infection; however, there is no such information in reported human cases. Given the differences between 2020 and 2023 in terms of epidemiology and availability of vaccines and specific treatment against COVID-19, it is rational not to extrapolate these early findings to present times. It is expected that the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory virus co-infections will evolve in the upcoming seasons. Multiplex real-time PCR-based assays have been developed in the past two years and should be used to increase diagnostic and infection control capacity, and also for surveillance purposes. Given that COVID-19 and influenza share the same high-risk groups, it is essential that the latter get vaccinated against both viruses. Further studies are needed to elucidate how SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory virus co-infections will be shaped in the upcoming years, in terms of impact and prognosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Animals , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Coinfection/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics
15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 259, 2023 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2297864

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Viral reactivations and co-infections have been reported among COVID-19 patients. However, studies on the clinical outcomes of different viral reactivations and co-infections are currently in limit. Thus, the primary purpose of this review is to perform an overarching investigation on the cases of latent virus reactivation and co-infection in COVID-19 patients to build collective evidence contributing to improving patient health. The aim of the study was to conduct a literature review to compare the patient characteristics and outcomes of reactivations and co-infections of different viruses. METHODS: Our population of interest included confirmed COVID-19 patients who were diagnosed with a viral infection either concurrently or following their COVID-19 diagnosis. We extracted the relevant literature through a systematic search using the key terms in the online databases including the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), from inception onwards up to June 2022. The authors independently extracted data from eligible studies and assessed the risk of bias using the Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting (CARE) guidelines and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Main patient characteristics, frequency of each manifestation, and diagnostic criteria used in studies were summarized in tables. RESULTS: In total, 53 articles were included in this review. We identified 40 reactivation studies, 8 coinfection studies, and 5 studies where concomitant infection in COVID-19 patients was not distinguished as either reactivation or coinfection. Data were extracted for 12 viruses including IAV, IBV, EBV, CMV, VZV, HHV-1, HHV-2, HHV-6, HHV-7, HHV-8, HBV, and Parvovirus B19. EBV, HHV-1, and CMV were most frequently observed within the reactivation cohort, whereas IAV and EBV within the coinfection cohort. In both reactivation and coinfection groups, patients reported cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and immunosuppression as comorbidities, acute kidney injury as complication, and lymphopenia and elevated D-dimer and CRP levels from blood tests. Common pharmaceutical interventions in two groups included steroids and antivirals. CONCLUSION: Overall, these findings expand our knowledge on the characteristics of COVID-19 patients with viral reactivations and co-infections. Our experience with current review indicates a need for further investigations on virus reactivation and coinfection among COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Virus Diseases , Humans , Coinfection/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/epidemiology
16.
Molecules ; 28(8)2023 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2294072

ABSTRACT

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) produces the pathologic basis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). An increase in the viral load in the body leads to a decline in the number of T lymphocytes, compromising the patient's immune system. Some opportunistic diseases may result, such as tuberculosis (TB), which is the most common in seropositive patients. Long-term treatment is required for HIV-TB coinfection, and cocktails of drugs for both diseases are used concomitantly. The most challenging aspects of treatment are the occurrence of drug interactions, overlapping toxicity, no adherence to treatment and cases of resistance. Recent approaches have involved using molecules that can act synergistically on two or more distinct targets. The development of multitarget molecules could overcome the disadvantages of the therapies used to treat HIV-TB coinfection. This report is the first review on using molecules with activities against HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) for molecular hybridization and multitarget strategies. Here, we discuss the importance and development of multiple targets as a means of improving adherence to therapy in cases of the coexistence of these pathologies. In this context, several studies on the development of structural entities to treat HIV-TB simultaneously are discussed.


Subject(s)
Coinfection , HIV Infections , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Humans , HIV , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/microbiology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy
17.
PLoS Pathog ; 19(3): e1011167, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286901

ABSTRACT

Despite the availability of effective vaccines, the persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) suggests that cocirculation with other pathogens and resulting multiepidemics (of, for example, COVID-19 and influenza) may become increasingly frequent. To better forecast and control the risk of such multiepidemics, it is essential to elucidate the potential interactions of SARS-CoV-2 with other pathogens; these interactions, however, remain poorly defined. Here, we aimed to review the current body of evidence about SARS-CoV-2 interactions. Our review is structured in four parts. To study pathogen interactions in a systematic and comprehensive way, we first developed a general framework to capture their major components: sign (either negative for antagonistic interactions or positive for synergistic interactions), strength (i.e., magnitude of the interaction), symmetry (describing whether the interaction depends on the order of infection of interacting pathogens), duration (describing whether the interaction is short-lived or long-lived), and mechanism (e.g., whether interaction modifies susceptibility to infection, transmissibility of infection, or severity of disease). Second, we reviewed the experimental evidence from animal models about SARS-CoV-2 interactions. Of the 14 studies identified, 11 focused on the outcomes of coinfection with nonattenuated influenza A viruses (IAVs), and 3 with other pathogens. The 11 studies on IAV used different designs and animal models (ferrets, hamsters, and mice) but generally demonstrated that coinfection increased disease severity compared with either monoinfection. By contrast, the effect of coinfection on the viral load of either virus was variable and inconsistent across studies. Third, we reviewed the epidemiological evidence about SARS-CoV-2 interactions in human populations. Although numerous studies were identified, only a few were specifically designed to infer interaction, and many were prone to multiple biases, including confounding. Nevertheless, their results suggested that influenza and pneumococcal conjugate vaccinations were associated with a reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, fourth, we formulated simple transmission models of SARS-CoV-2 cocirculation with an epidemic viral pathogen or an endemic bacterial pathogen, showing how they can naturally incorporate the proposed framework. More generally, we argue that such models, when designed with an integrative and multidisciplinary perspective, will be invaluable tools to resolve the substantial uncertainties that remain about SARS-CoV-2 interactions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Influenza, Human , Humans , Animals , Mice , SARS-CoV-2 , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Ferrets
18.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0283334, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2260361

ABSTRACT

An in-depth analysis of the epidemiological patterns of TB/HIV co-infection is essential since it helps to target high-risk areas with effective control measures. The main objective of this study was to assess the spatial clustering of TB/HIV co-infection prevalence in Ethiopia for the year 2018 using district-level aggregated TB and HIV data obtained from the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health. The global Moran's index, Getis-Ord [Formula: see text] local statistic, and Bayesian spatial modeling techniques were applied to analyse the data. The result of the study shows that TB among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and HIV among TB patients prevalence were geographically heterogeneous. The highest prevalence of TB among PLHIV in 2018 was reported in the Gambella region (1.44%). The overall prevalence of TB among PLHIV in Ethiopia in the same year was 0.38% while the prevalence of HIV among TB patients was 6.88%. Both district-level prevalences of HIV among TB patients and TB among PLHIV were positively spatially autocorrelated, but the latter was not statistically significant. The local indicators of spatial analysis using the Getis-Ord statistic also identified hot-spots districts for both types of TB/HIV co-infection data. The results of Bayesian spatial logistic regression with spatially structured and unstructured random effects using the Besag, York, and Mollié prior showed that not all the heterogeneities in the prevalence of HIV among TB patients and TB among PLHIV were explained by the spatially structured random effects. This study expanded knowledge about the spatial clustering of TB among PLHIV and HIV among TB patients in Ethiopia at the district level in 2018. The findings provide information to health policymakers in the country to plan geographically targeted and integrated interventions to jointly control TB and HIV.


Subject(s)
Coinfection , HIV Infections , Latent Tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Humans , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Bayes Theorem , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Spatial Analysis
19.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0283804, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266217

ABSTRACT

Acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) during the winter months are associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared to other seasons of the year, with children below five, elderly, and immunocompromised patients being the most susceptible. Influenza A and B viruses, rhinovirus, coronaviruses, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, and parainfluenza viruses, are the most frequently identified causes of viral ARTIs. In addition, the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in 2019 provided an additional viral cause of ARTIs. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the epidemiological status of upper respiratory infections, their main causative agents, and reported clinical presentation in the winter months of 2021, during two important surges of COVID-19 in Jordan. Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from 339 symptomatic patients during the period from December 2021 to March 2022, followed by nucleic acid isolation using a Viral RNA/DNA extraction Kit. The causative virus species associated with the patient's respiratory symptoms was determined utilizing a multiplex real-time PCR targeting 21 viruses, 11 bacteria, and a single fungus. SARS-CoV-2 was identified in 39.2% of the patients (n = 133/339). A total of 15 different pathogens were also identified as co-infections among these 133 patients (n = 67/133). SARS-CoV-2-Bacterial coinfections (37.6%, n = 50/133) were the most frequent, with Bordetella species being the most common, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, and H.influenzae type B. Viral coinfection rate was 27.8% (n = 37/133), with Influenza B virus and Human bocavirus being the most common. In Conclusion, Both SARS-CoV-2, influenza B virus, and Bordetella accounted for the majority of infections in patients with URTI during the winter months of 2021-2022. Interestingly, more than 50% of the patients with symptoms of URTIs were confirmed to have a coinfection with two or more respiratory pathogens, with SARS-CoV-2 and Bordetella coinfection being most predominant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Respiratory Tract Infections , Child , Humans , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Jordan/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Prevalence , Seasons , Coinfection/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Influenza B virus/genetics , Bacteria/genetics
20.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 52: 102557, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2256167

ABSTRACT

Patients with respiratory viral infections are more likely to develop co-infections leading to increased fatality. Mucormycosis is an epidemic amidst the COVID-19 pandemic that conveys a 'double threat' to the global health fraternity. Mucormycosis is caused by the Mucorales group of fungi and exhibits acute angioinvasion generally in immunocompromised patients. The most familiar foci of infections are sinuses (39%), lungs (24%), and skin tissues (19%) where the overall dissemination occurs in 23% of cases. The mortality rate in the case of disseminated mucormycosis is found to be 96%. Symptoms are mostly nonspecific and often resemble other common bacterial or fungal infections. Currently, COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) is being reported from a number of countries such as the USA, Turkey, France, Mexico, Iran, Austria, UK, Brazil, and Italy, while India is the hotspot for this deadly co-infection, accounting for approximately 28,252 cases up to June 8, 2021. It strikes patients within 12-18 days after COVID-19 recovery, and nearly 80% require surgery. Nevertheless, the mortality rate can reach 94% if the diagnosis is delayed or remains untreated. Sometimes COVID-19 is the sole predisposing factor for CAM. Therefore, this study may provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians and researchers dealing with fungal infections, intending to link the potential translational knowledge and prospective therapeutic challenges to counter this opportunistic pathogen.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Mucormycosis , Humans , Mucormycosis/epidemiology , Pandemics , Brazil , Coinfection/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL